Overall Rating: 5

6 out of 9 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| March 14, 2011 |
| William S. - Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire |
|
very light, not as big as it is on the picture. beautiful though. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
9 out of 13 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| April 16, 2011 |
| Julia S - Port St. Lucie, FL |
|
I am so happy with this ring! Almost embarrassed with all the compliments it gets. Completely beautful, stunning, and all those good things but the uniquness sets it apart. Can't believe the price because I expected it to be much more. Love it! |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
6 out of 12 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| January 12, 2011 |
| Samantha P. - Chicago, IL |
|
It says wedding band, but I bought this out of curiosity for myself. Thought the tri-color looked neat and it does in person. Not an everyday ring for me but when I wear it people always ask about it. It is really light but the price for a gold ring I like. Neat little ring that I would recommend for those looking for something different. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
6 out of 15 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| February 24, 2011 |
| Makayla b. - Grand Prairie, TX |
|
A terrific price for an engagement and wedding band set with over a carat worth of diamonds around the bands. Past, Present, Future ring is what I was looking for and the mounting is quality and strong-I may have a bit of the band shaved down since it is thicker for my hands but overall I love this ring and would recommend it. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
0 out of 0 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| March 01, 2011 |
| Randolph A B. - Mount Airy, MD |
|
Weight was off a size 6.5 weighed 5g's even the said this ring was6.2 minimum |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No