Overall Rating: 5
6 out of 9 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| March 14, 2011 |
| William S. - Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire |
|
very light, not as big as it is on the picture. beautiful though. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
0 out of 0 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| March 01, 2011 |
| Randolph A B. - Mount Airy, MD |
|
Weight was off a size 6.5 weighed 5g's even the said this ring was6.2 minimum |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
3 out of 6 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| November 13, 2013 |
| Ryan M. - Lancaster, PA |
|
Pretty much everything I expected in a gold band. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 12 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| February 08, 2011 |
| ryan h. - McAllen, TX |
|
On my own to find a wedding band and found this as a great alternative to the standard yellow gold band. Love the overall look and how in sunlight can look almost like a prism or something. It's cool. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| June 20, 2014 |
| Samuel W. - San Francisco, CA |
|
Another reviewer mentions htat this is titanium. It is not. It is Tungsten, which is heavier. I've had this ring for 6 years, and there is absolutely no sign of wear. Not a scratch, not a blemish. You should know that the matte finish on the design is mildly abrasive. I use it to polish my fingernails. But being made of tungsten it will scratch finished surfaces and glass, so you have to be a little careful what you glide your hand over when you are wearing this ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}