Overall Rating: 5
6 out of 17 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| February 20, 2011 |
| Aiden E. - Shreveport, LA |
|
Nice ring but less gold than I thought but for the list price, a definite steal. 14k simple wedding bands go for over 200 easy at the locations I've seen. With the detailing and the gold, a real good buy like other reviewers said. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
9 out of 13 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| November 22, 2010 |
| Syd o - Montgomery, AL |
|
Nothing wrong with this ring. Definitely doesn't look cheap and overall a good ring. My girlfriend loves it and glad she feels tat way. Will buy future rings here ;) |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 5 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| December 28, 2013 |
| dave g. - Salinas, CA |
|
It's very nice ring but too simple for my fiance's liking so we're exchanging this one for another cubic zirconia ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| June 20, 2014 |
| Samuel W. - San Francisco, CA |
|
Another reviewer mentions htat this is titanium. It is not. It is Tungsten, which is heavier. I've had this ring for 6 years, and there is absolutely no sign of wear. Not a scratch, not a blemish. You should know that the matte finish on the design is mildly abrasive. I use it to polish my fingernails. But being made of tungsten it will scratch finished surfaces and glass, so you have to be a little careful what you glide your hand over when you are wearing this ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
5 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| August 05, 2013 |
| Claude B. - Winnipeg, MB |
|
It's a great ring, cheaper than other Benchmarks I saw in a store -- simple and classic, just the way I like it. I did have to use the lifetime warranty and got it replaced no problem. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
;){kind=link}