Overall Rating: 5
4 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| June 20, 2014 |
| Samuel W. - San Francisco, CA |
|
Another reviewer mentions htat this is titanium. It is not. It is Tungsten, which is heavier. I've had this ring for 6 years, and there is absolutely no sign of wear. Not a scratch, not a blemish. You should know that the matte finish on the design is mildly abrasive. I use it to polish my fingernails. But being made of tungsten it will scratch finished surfaces and glass, so you have to be a little careful what you glide your hand over when you are wearing this ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
9 out of 12 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| January 17, 2011 |
| andy o. - Cary, NC |
|
Completely and utterly fantastic looking ring!! The double cable inlay makes this ring look out of this world. Highly recommend!! |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
5 out of 9 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| February 21, 2011 |
| Steve k. - Garden Grove, CA |
|
Cool looking band that is my wedding ring. Really like two tone design with the white and yellow gold, strong quality, durable over the first two months and still looks like new. Got it engraved and was great. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
3 out of 9 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| June 02, 2011 |
| Donna P - Salem, OR |
|
Excellent quality and a really beautiful yellow gold ring. Actually looks just like the picture out of the box. The thickness of the band is ideal for my husband who is of a larger build and does have a ?comfort-fit? like the description says. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
0 out of 0 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| March 01, 2011 |
| Randolph A B. - Mount Airy, MD |
|
Weight was off a size 6.5 weighed 5g's even the said this ring was6.2 minimum |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
;){kind=link}