Overall Rating: 5
5 out of 8 people found the following review helpful:
Rating:  |
| March 14, 2011 |
| William S. - Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire |
|
very light, not as big as it is on the picture. beautiful though. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
5 out of 13 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| November 17, 2010 |
| Noah A. - Sterling Heights, MI |
|
Sharp ring that has a nice design. Lots of compliments and easy to wear. I also think steel is better than the titanium rings, feels stronger and doesn't scratch as easy. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 10 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| August 14, 2013 |
| Carl M. - Doylestown, PA |
|
Beautiful and sparkly for the price. Picture doesn't do it justice. What more can I ask for in a diamond ring at this price? |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
2 out of 5 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| November 13, 2013 |
| Ryan M. - Lancaster, PA |
|
Pretty much everything I expected in a gold band. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
4 out of 7 people found the following review helpful:
| Rating: |
| June 20, 2014 |
| Samuel W. - San Francisco, CA |
|
Another reviewer mentions htat this is titanium. It is not. It is Tungsten, which is heavier. I've had this ring for 6 years, and there is absolutely no sign of wear. Not a scratch, not a blemish. You should know that the matte finish on the design is mildly abrasive. I use it to polish my fingernails. But being made of tungsten it will scratch finished surfaces and glass, so you have to be a little careful what you glide your hand over when you are wearing this ring. |
Was this review helpful to you? Yes / No
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}